<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/6.10.3-stable" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>E-learn Weblog of Willem van Valkenburg - Latest Comments on edX: the day after</title>
		<link>http://www.e-learn.nl/?disp=comments</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.e-learn.nl/?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=945" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-UK</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=6.10.3-stable"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<title> Robert Schuwer [Visitor] in response to: edX: the day after</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 13:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="user anonymous" rel="bubbletip_comment_499">Robert Schuwer</span> <span class="bUser-anonymous-tag">[Visitor]</span></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c499@http://www.e-learn.nl/</guid>
			<description>Willem,

Thanks for your blog and your good questions around this initiative. The &amp;#8220;disruptive&amp;#8221; character of this initiative concerning new didactical models is already questioned in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/university-venus/problem-edx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/university-venus/problem-edx&lt;/a&gt; . 

Added to your questions is something I have already noticed in the Terms of Use of Coursera: the materials are not open in the sense of the &amp;#8220;4R&amp;#8217;s&quot;. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coursera.org/about/terms&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://www.coursera.org/about/terms&lt;/a&gt; states &amp;#8220;&lt;em&gt;You may download material from the Sites only for your own personal, non-commercial use. You may not otherwise copy, reproduce, retransmit, distribute, publish, commercially exploit or otherwise transfer any material, nor may you modify or create derivatives works of the material.&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#8220;. So adding to your &amp;#8220;connecting the dots&amp;#8221; question: is it legitive to adopt the course in your own curriculum when you are a public-funded university in the Netherlands? &lt;br /&gt;</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Willem,

Thanks for your blog and your good questions around this initiative. The &#8220;disruptive&#8221; character of this initiative concerning new didactical models is already questioned in <a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/university-venus/problem-edx" rel="nofollow">http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/university-venus/problem-edx</a> . 

Added to your questions is something I have already noticed in the Terms of Use of Coursera: the materials are not open in the sense of the &#8220;4R&#8217;s". <a href="https://www.coursera.org/about/terms" rel="nofollow">https://www.coursera.org/about/terms</a> states &#8220;<em>You may download material from the Sites only for your own personal, non-commercial use. You may not otherwise copy, reproduce, retransmit, distribute, publish, commercially exploit or otherwise transfer any material, nor may you modify or create derivatives works of the material.</em>&#8220;. So adding to your &#8220;connecting the dots&#8221; question: is it legitive to adopt the course in your own curriculum when you are a public-funded university in the Netherlands? <br />]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://www.e-learn.nl/2012/05/03/edx-the-day-after#c499</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
