The pedagogical foundation of MOOCs
posted on May 8, 2013 by willem in DelftX
An interesting journal article of David Glance, Martin Forsey and Myles Riley of the University of Western Australia (UWA):
In 2011, the respective roles of higher education institutions and students worldwide were brought into question by the rise of the massive open online course (MOOC). MOOCs are defined by signature characteristics that include: lectures formatted as short videos combined with formative quizzes; automated assessment and/or peer and self–assessment and an online forum for peer support and discussion. Although not specifically designed to optimise learning, claims have been made that MOOCs are based on sound pedagogical foundations that are at the very least comparable with courses offered by universities in face–to–face mode. To validate this, we examined the literature for empirical evidence substantiating such claims. Although empirical evidence directly related to MOOCs was difficult to find, the evidence suggests that there is no reason to believe that MOOCs are any less effective a learning experience than their face–to–face counterparts. Indeed, in some aspects, they may actually improve learning outcomes.
Their conclusions is that MOOCs have a sound pedagogical basis for their formats. What they have not addressed however are the larger questions around whether taking a collection of MOOCs could replace obtaining an education on campus at a university in all of its facets of personal development and education.
The pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses
by David George Glance, Martin Forsey, and Myles Riley.
First Monday, Volume 18, Number 5 - 6 May 2013
Comment from: Brandon Muramatsu [Visitor]
The way I found this article had this commentary which I like: “All we can conclude is that there is no evidence yet that they have not been built on a solid foundation.” (http://sco.lt/6TD9JR)
Form is loading...